Diary of an Overweight Sistah

Join me on my journey of weight loss. It will be a long hard road. When I started out as an adult I was a size 0. I am a size 16/18 depending who the outfit is made for. With hypertension and diabetes in my family...something has to give and it won't be my heart nor my health so the race is on! I will log into my blog daily to keep you posted. HOld me accountable. Laugh with me, cry with me, lecture me. If I could figure out how to post periodic pictures I would, but I don't so sorry.

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Blogging does a body good

So I have been slipping on blogging online, but keeping a paper journal. I guess I am old fashioned. I really like the pen to paper method.

I have been on a mission lately and was selected as member of the month for my gym at work. I was told the bio was a good motivator and a story to share, so I am posting it here.

Fitness has not always been a part of my life, in fact it is easier to say it was never a part of my life until the around 2004. Growing up I was always very skinny, I weighed 99 pounds when I graduated from high school. Working out and a healthy lifestyle didn’t seem necessary I was underweight. Then over the course of 7 years of living in Jackson, MS and New Orleans for undergrad and grad school I went from a size 0 to a size 16. I just couldn’t balance that southern food J

By 2004 I had been back home for a few years and had thought about working out sporadically and did nothing. I started working for the Mayor of Seattle and he did a weight loss challenge and it encouraged me to join the gym in our building. It was during this time I developed a love for my favorite gym class spin. However I was still not serious until my 35th birthday I had my annual check-up. My doctor looked at my medical history and told me I needed to get serious about losing weight. The realities of life hit me, my dad became diabetic at 38, and my mom died at 40, and as I got closer to those ages finally it dawned on me I needed to take my health a bit serious. For me it really became a battle for life.

Around this same time I had a Sorority sister who got on a fitness regime and started emailing our listserv about it. She managed to lose over 100 pounds, just by changing her diet and exercise (if you are interested she blogs her story at: blackgirlsguidetoweightloss.com). Seeing her do it made me wake up and get serious.

Moving from Seattle to Chicago in 2006 was a major fitness set back. It took me almost 6 months to join a new gym, and the convenience of it being in my building was gone. It wasn’t until 2010 when I came to work for CHA as a contractor that I got back to a consistent routine. One thing I have learned about myself is CONVENIENCE is a major factor in my commitment to working out. I joined BRAC and for the 7 months I was here made it to the gym at least 4 days a week and would go to my neighborhood gym 1 day a week. When my CHA Contract was up I was back to the maybe 3 days a week at my neighborhood gym and I was commuting a two hours a day to work and had no motivation. At 2011 when I came back to CHA, one of the selling points of coming back was BRAC and the ability to work out daily. Not to mention the Active CHA program which supports employees to adopt healthy lifestyles all around. Participating in BRAC bowl this year really made me step up my workout game plan and I have maintained a 5 day a week, often 2 times a day schedule since October.

At the end 2010 I started working on monitoring my eating habits using myfitnesspal.com and I decided to become a vegetarian. That didn’t last long as I am from the west coast. I love seafood, so I finally settled on pescatarian. However I still struggled with eating right and working out right at the SAME TIME.

Since returning to BRAC in January 2011 I have lost 25 pounds. I have about 40 more to go. Part of my lifestyle change has incorporated cycling, in the spring and summer I bike to work and last year I did several long distance bike rides, Tour De Cure (75 Miles), Bike MS (150 miles over two days), and Ride for AIDS Chicago (200 miles over two days, though I cheated out of 25 and got in the SAG vehicle). I recognize that carrying this extra weight also makes cycling a lot more difficult so that too is a new motivation to lose the extra pounds. As a competitive person having an event to train for motivates me. I will continue to cycle as I love my bike, but this year’s challenge for me is to do a triathlon. I have not run more than a 400 sprint in my life and barely can swim. However it is making me diversify my workouts.
I love the support and encouragement I get from BRAC staff and tips I routinely get as I conquer this learning to swim as a very grown person. I can honestly say it has made an incredible difference on this journey for me.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Motivated

So I have not been blogging as much lately and happened to log in today and realized I totally could.....

So on my weightloss kick I have decided to train for an extreme sport. Cycling. I am doing a 100+ ride June 12-13.... Pray for me.

Thursday, March 30, 2006

We Lost Weight for Love

http://health.msn.com/dietnutrition/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=100121515&GT1=7850

Sunday, March 26, 2006

Update

I am back.... Sorta. I haven't been feeling like blogging. I am excited. I am on the road and since I couldn't work out I went and walked about 3.5 miles today. I mean it is cold as heck here and I did it.....

I thought this was a good article:

Reasons Very Low Cal Diets are Bad for Weight LossUnless there is some medical reason that has been advised by your doctor, aim for at least 1500 calories when using a calorie controlled diet. The larger your body frame and training needs the more calories your body requires. Example of a reasonable calorie intake: A female who weighs around 125, is 5'6" tall, around 30 years old and performs light exercise 1-3 days per week should be consuming around 1800 low fat calories per day. This same woman's basic caloric needs, just to keep her body running (without the exercise) is around 1300! Weight loss resulting from a fast or severe calorie restriction is always temporary – after all, more than half of the promised weight loss is from water and muscle, NOT fat. Here are the NEGATIVE consequences of very low cal dieting: A Decrease in Metabolism. During fasting, your body goes into starvation mode, resulting in a decrease in metabolism, body temperature, blood pressure, pulse, and breathing rate. Your body is now trying to conserve energy and will begin to store fat reserves away any way it can. Once you start to eat adequate calories again, all of these processes, including your metabolic rate, will return to normal unless the fast is for an extended period of time (1 -2 weeks) in which case the effects may be longer lasting, even permanent. Bluntly put: By altering your metabolism, fasting can ironically ruin your body's ability to lose weight! Muscle Loss. A percentage of muscle loss is an inevitable result of any weight loss program; however, this loss is accelerated when weight loss is very rapid as it is with fasting. On crash diets, each pound of weight loss contains more lean tissue and less body fat than a diet that produces weight loss of 1-1/2 to 2 pounds a week. Muscle weighs two and half times more than fat!
Low-calorie dieting stimulates the activity of lypogenic enzymes (fat-conserving) and depresses lypolytic enzymes activity (fat-burning). You\'ll need fewer calories just to maintain your weight. When muscle tissue loss occurs, glucose storage in the muscles is reduced, augmenting tendencies toward diabetes. The more glucose you have in your blood needing to be stored, the higher the amount of insulin released to lower it. Low-calorie diets are not balanced. The brain demands blood glucose far in excess than that supplied by a diet under 1000 cals a day. The result is that the liver converts most of the protein in the diet to glucose. Therefore, not only are there not enough cals to support nutrient needs, but the liver wastes the given nutrients by converting them to glucose. The liver, which normally produces HDL cholesterol (the good stuff), shifts to the production of LDL (the bad stuff) during a fast or radical low-calorie diet. Hormones When calories are severely restricted, serotonin (the "feel-good" brain chemical) drops, and that can lead to feelings of depression, anxiety and low self-esteem--all triggers for emotional overeating. In addition, the body\'s levels of leptin (a hormone that suppresses appetite and revs up metabolism) drops, while it\'s levels of ghrelin (a hormone that stimulates food intake) rise. So, a restrictive diet can leave you with an uncontrollable desire to eat. What is severely restricting? It\'s more than 500 calories per day. It\'s avoiding carbs. It\'s telling yourself you can\'t eat this-or-that. Eating a variety of foods is not just a good idea for our health--providing several forms of fats, fibers, proteins, phytochemicals, flavenoids, etc.--eating a variety of foods also helps keep our waistline trim (unless we overeat). How? Besides the balance of the brain-chemicals mentioned above, another reason is that without restrictions there is no reason to feel guilt. We all ",1]
);
//-->
Low-calorie dieting stimulates the activity of lypogenic enzymes (fat-conserving) and depresses lypolytic enzymes activity (fat-burning). You'll need fewer calories just to maintain your weight. When muscle tissue loss occurs, glucose storage in the muscles is reduced, augmenting tendencies toward diabetes. The more glucose you have in your blood needing to be stored, the higher the amount of insulin released to lower it. Low-calorie diets are not balanced. The brain demands blood glucose far in excess than that supplied by a diet under 1000 cals a day. The result is that the liver converts most of the protein in the diet to glucose. Therefore, not only are there not enough cals to support nutrient needs, but the liver wastes the given nutrients by converting them to glucose. The liver, which normally produces HDL cholesterol (the good stuff), shifts to the production of LDL (the bad stuff) during a fast or radical low-calorie diet. Hormones When calories are severely restricted, serotonin (the "feel-good" brain chemical) drops, and that can lead to feelings of depression, anxiety and low self-esteem--all triggers for emotional overeating. In addition, the body's levels of leptin (a hormone that suppresses appetite and revs up metabolism) drops, while it's levels of ghrelin (a hormone that stimulates food intake) rise. So, a restrictive diet can leave you with an uncontrollable desire to eat. What is severely restricting? It's more than 500 calories per day. It's avoiding carbs. It's telling yourself you can't eat this-or-that. Eating a variety of foods is not just a good idea for our health--providing several forms of fats, fibers, proteins, phytochemicals, flavenoids, etc.--eating a variety of foods also helps keep our waistline trim (unless we overeat). How? Besides the balance of the brain-chemicals mentioned above, another reason is that without restrictions there is no reason to feel guilt. We all
know where guilt leads to. So the goal becomes finding a balance: Eating enough, but not too much. We all have different personality traits, but there is one weapon in common: Knowing where our calories are coming from. I cannot tell you the number of times a client will come to me, shocked, exclaiming that they\'ve just found out their favorite lunch burrito is nearly 2000 calories! Or that they\'ve been consuming 800 calories a day in specialty coffee drinks, etc. You don\'t have to be a calorie counter, but you should learn proper portion sizes, limit visible fats (cheese, mayo, butter) and choose high fiber foods to keep your waistline from expanding and for good health. In a nutshell, enjoy your food, but have a good idea of where your calories are coming from.

Wednesday, July 13, 2005

Killing me softly

Okay I am tripping this week. Two a days daily, but what can I say. I am not eating right so I have to try to balance a little bit. Right about now the gym is a habit. It takes no motivation. It should be a good thing, but I am not so sure. I Truly think you get out of it what you put into it so your attitude can make a difference. This week I have just been there. All thought the skinny chick who lost 100 pounds last year is there both times I go with me so I catch her trail wind.

So this article really moved me. I didn't gain emotional weight, but when I gained weight found myself emotional about it.

Walking Off the Fat, Across the Land By Amy ArgetsingerPEACH SPRINGS, Ariz. -- This week, his 13th on the road, has been the hardest thus far for Steve Vaught, a 400-pound man trying to walk across America.On Sunday morning, he found a creek just as the desert heat forced a midday break. But when he woke from a nap and tried to fill his water bottles, the stream had already gone dry. Late that night, he walked right past his scheduled motel stop in Truxton, a flyspeck on historic Route 66 so slight it vanished when the sun went down. On Monday, out of water in 102-degree heat and miles from any town, he sent a frantic text message to his wife, who called the local police. They drove him to a hotel, where he rested a night and a day, sick with dehydration. On Wednesday he started late and tangled with a scary dude on the desolate highway. "I'm quitting," he told his wife this week. She said okay.But within hours he hit the road again, as they always sort of knew he would. For quitting is not so easy when you're 500 miles from home.
This spring, as he neared his 40th birthday, Vaught had an epiphany: If he didn\'t lose the weight, he would die before 50. But dieting would not work, he decided, and neither would normal exercise. He knew he was the kind of guy who could rationalize his way out of one three-mile walk after another. "My weakness," he said, "is the easy way out."\r\nSo Vaught made it hard. On April 10, he left his home in San Diego -- and his wife and two children -- and started walking, alone, to New York.There\'s something about this nation\'s geography that inspires this kind of journey -- to hike the Appalachian Trail, to kayak the entire Mississippi River, or just to drive from Maine to Key West, and maybe make sense of things along the way. Which is how it has gone for Vaught, on the road mulling issues far beyond weight or willpower. The trip has not gone completely as planned. He has only rarely come even close to the pace of 20 miles a day he estimated would put him in verdant Missouri by now, not Arizona in July.\r\nHe strained a couple of ligaments shortly after he started, and he lost three toenails climbing the final mountain pass out of California.If he is very lucky, Vaught will clear 80 miles this week, a fraction of his 3,000-mile goal. On Wednesday, he remained deeply concerned about his ability to cover a 25-mile stretch of uninhabited desert between Seligman and Ash Fork.\r\nOn the bright side: That 400-pound man now weighs only 350."Does this seem insane?" Vaught wants to know.He is a big guy, 6-foot-1, a former Marine and longtime tow-truck operator who, as the fat melts away from his cheekbones and jaws, is beginning to bear a slight resemblance to the buffed-up actor Jerry O\'Connell, but with a lumberjack beard and shock of hair like an unmowed lawn.\r\nWell, that depends on what you mean by "insane." Doctors, certainly, would call it inadvisable. A seriously overweight person who embarks on any kind of strenuous physical activity could place dangerous stresses on his joints and heart, said Samuel Klein, director of the Center for Human Nutrition at Washington University in St. Louis.\r\n",1]
);
//-->
This spring, as he neared his 40th birthday, Vaught had an epiphany: If he didn't lose the weight, he would die before 50. But dieting would not work, he decided, and neither would normal exercise. He knew he was the kind of guy who could rationalize his way out of one three-mile walk after another. "My weakness," he said, "is the easy way out." So Vaught made it hard. On April 10, he left his home in San Diego -- and his wife and two children -- and started walking, alone, to New York.There's something about this nation's geography that inspires this kind of journey -- to hike the Appalachian Trail, to kayak the entire Mississippi River, or just to drive from Maine to Key West, and maybe make sense of things along the way. Which is how it has gone for Vaught, on the road mulling issues far beyond weight or willpower. The trip has not gone completely as planned. He has only rarely come even close to the pace of 20 miles a day he estimated would put him in verdant Missouri by now, not Arizona in July. He strained a couple of ligaments shortly after he started, and he lost three toenails climbing the final mountain pass out of California.If he is very lucky, Vaught will clear 80 miles this week, a fraction of his 3,000-mile goal. On Wednesday, he remained deeply concerned about his ability to cover a 25-mile stretch of uninhabited desert between Seligman and Ash Fork. On the bright side: That 400-pound man now weighs only 350."Does this seem insane?" Vaught wants to know.He is a big guy, 6-foot-1, a former Marine and longtime tow-truck operator who, as the fat melts away from his cheekbones and jaws, is beginning to bear a slight resemblance to the buffed-up actor Jerry O'Connell, but with a lumberjack beard and shock of hair like an unmowed lawn. Well, that depends on what you mean by "insane." Doctors, certainly, would call it inadvisable. A seriously overweight person who embarks on any kind of strenuous physical activity could place dangerous stresses on his joints and heart, said Samuel Klein, director of the Center for Human Nutrition at Washington University in St. Louis.
And such activity is especially worrisome in an area of environmental extremes, without someone to support him, Klein said. Even if he weighed 100 pounds, "walking across a desert without someone standing next to him with an umbrella and a fan and Gatorade might really be a problem."\r\nVaught, meanwhile, has been almost completely on his own. For the first few days after he set off from the Pacific Ocean, his wife, April, would pick him at up the end of the day to bring him home to sleep at her mother\'s house, where the family is staying. Soon, though, he had gone far enough that he had to start camping; now he has not seen his family in three weeks.\r\nNow and then a friend catches up with him for a few hours or days. But mostly it is just him and his 75-pound pack and the left-hand shoulder of the road.Since he entered the desert, he has had to cut back his walking hours dramatically. Now he walks from about 5:30 to 8:30 in the morning, when he has to stop and find shelter -- preferably in a store or post office if one is around, but usually under a bridge or in a culvert or bush.\r\nHe will sit there for 11 or 12 hours, until it is cool enough to walk again for a few hours. Just sit there. "I\'m too bored to read," he says, or even take in the landscape more than he already has.\r\n"It\'s beautiful for the first hour or so," he said. "And then it loses its impact."Yet on the question of "insane," the responses to the Web site chronicling his journey -- \r\nhttp://www.thefatmanwalking.com/ -- appear to be running heavily against. On a recent afternoon, Vaught accepts a ride from a reporter 35 miles down the road to a public library, where he checks his e-mail.There is one from a 37-year-old guy preparing to run his first marathon. A 62-year-old woman planning to hike the Pacific Crest Trail. People in such places as St. Louis and Altoona, Pa., offering food and water and a place to stay when he comes their way. Overweight people across the country begging to know Vaught\'s daily mileage so they can match it at home.\r\n",1]
);
//-->
And such activity is especially worrisome in an area of environmental extremes, without someone to support him, Klein said. Even if he weighed 100 pounds, "walking across a desert without someone standing next to him with an umbrella and a fan and Gatorade might really be a problem." Vaught, meanwhile, has been almost completely on his own. For the first few days after he set off from the Pacific Ocean, his wife, April, would pick him at up the end of the day to bring him home to sleep at her mother's house, where the family is staying. Soon, though, he had gone far enough that he had to start camping; now he has not seen his family in three weeks. Now and then a friend catches up with him for a few hours or days. But mostly it is just him and his 75-pound pack and the left-hand shoulder of the road.Since he entered the desert, he has had to cut back his walking hours dramatically. Now he walks from about 5:30 to 8:30 in the morning, when he has to stop and find shelter -- preferably in a store or post office if one is around, but usually under a bridge or in a culvert or bush. He will sit there for 11 or 12 hours, until it is cool enough to walk again for a few hours. Just sit there. "I'm too bored to read," he says, or even take in the landscape more than he already has."It's beautiful for the first hour or so," he said. "And then it loses its impact."Yet on the question of "insane," the responses to the Web site chronicling his journey -- http://www.thefatmanwalking.com/ -- appear to be running heavily against. On a recent afternoon, Vaught accepts a ride from a reporter 35 miles down the road to a public library, where he checks his e-mail.There is one from a 37-year-old guy preparing to run his first marathon. A 62-year-old woman planning to hike the Pacific Crest Trail. People in such places as St. Louis and Altoona, Pa., offering food and water and a place to stay when he comes their way. Overweight people across the country begging to know Vaught's daily mileage so they can match it at home.
Only a few call him crazy. Almost all say what an inspiration he is.It is something to think about, on those lonely and terrible days on the road, he says. "Now I have all these people not to let down."\r\nEven at 400 pounds, he never thought of himself as a fat guy. Perhaps because he never used to be, perhaps because it was the least of his problems.Fifteen years ago, he was the fun guy. A slew of girlfriends, a bunch of friends, a witty streak so hot he would gladly take the stage at a comedy club open-mike night. Then one evening in October 1990, driving too fast against the setting sun, he struck and killed an elderly couple crossing the street.\r\nThe accident sent him to jail for 10 days, ruined him financially and dulled him emotionally. When he started to put on the weight, he just didn\'t care. He remembers little about the next three years.After the birth of their first child, he grudgingly went to therapy, just so April would know she had done everything she could in case he killed himself. Medication snapped him out of his depression. But life didn\'t get any easier. A few businesses failed, and they went deep in debt on a house. And the weight, he realized, was bringing him down.\r\n"There\'s nothing appealing about fat people," he says bluntly. "You can\'t impress them when you\'re fat." His jobs steadily declined in quality. In March he said he walked away from the latest, managing a muffler repair shop, after the owners sniped about him sitting down too much at work.\r\nOne morning that week, he turned to April in bed. "I ought to walk across the U.S.," he said. Once he left, he added, it would be hard for him to quit."If that\'s what it\'s going to take," she replied.\r\nSo he has a lot to think about as he walks. About the anger he carried around so long, and how pointless it seems now. About how accepting help from people doesn\'t shame him anymore, now that he sometimes has to ask strangers for water. And about the value of living in the moment, of just surviving that next stretch of road.\r\n",1]
);
//-->
Only a few call him crazy. Almost all say what an inspiration he is.It is something to think about, on those lonely and terrible days on the road, he says. "Now I have all these people not to let down." Even at 400 pounds, he never thought of himself as a fat guy. Perhaps because he never used to be, perhaps because it was the least of his problems.Fifteen years ago, he was the fun guy. A slew of girlfriends, a bunch of friends, a witty streak so hot he would gladly take the stage at a comedy club open-mike night. Then one evening in October 1990, driving too fast against the setting sun, he struck and killed an elderly couple crossing the street. The accident sent him to jail for 10 days, ruined him financially and dulled him emotionally. When he started to put on the weight, he just didn't care. He remembers little about the next three years.After the birth of their first child, he grudgingly went to therapy, just so April would know she had done everything she could in case he killed himself. Medication snapped him out of his depression. But life didn't get any easier. A few businesses failed, and they went deep in debt on a house. And the weight, he realized, was bringing him down. "There's nothing appealing about fat people," he says bluntly. "You can't impress them when you're fat." His jobs steadily declined in quality. In March he said he walked away from the latest, managing a muffler repair shop, after the owners sniped about him sitting down too much at work. One morning that week, he turned to April in bed. "I ought to walk across the U.S.," he said. Once he left, he added, it would be hard for him to quit."If that's what it's going to take," she replied. So he has a lot to think about as he walks. About the anger he carried around so long, and how pointless it seems now. About how accepting help from people doesn't shame him anymore, now that he sometimes has to ask strangers for water. And about the value of living in the moment, of just surviving that next stretch of road.
"It has nothing to do with weight anymore," he says. "It\'s about getting back to the person I was."Vaught gets the reporter to drive him back west to the outskirts of Peach Springs, near where he stopped walking. At 5 \r\np.m., it\'s still 92 degrees, and he looks for a place in the shade where he can wait.He sees it about 50 yards off the highway, a culvert over a now-abandoned part of the original Route 66. "This is good," he says. He lifts his pack onto his shoulders. The strap holding it to his still-massive gut now has eight inches of excess past the buckle, compared with two inches when he began.\r\nHe manages to heave his body over the guardrail and starts walking. By the time the car has turned around and driven past again, his 350 pounds have vanished into the desert.

Staff writer Catharine Skipp contributed to this report.

Wednesday, July 06, 2005

What is progress

When trying to lose weight what is progress? I mean folks ask how much have you lost? I have no idea. To me I am defining progress on I am living a healthier life. So progress to me is not stuffing myself even when I am eating something I shouldn't. Progress is being dog tired yesterday and still going to the gym. Progress is actually counting calories and reading food labels.

I still don't like working out. The ultimate progress will be when I enjoy it LOL

Ooh and progress today was the lights were out and I still went and bought a healthy lunch instead of the junk I was craving.

Wednesday, June 08, 2005

The Hour Glass Figure

http://www.thirdage.com/news/articles/ALT02/05/06/08/ALT02050608-01.html

An Hourglass Figure Is Good for You

Tobacco Firms Wooed Female SmokersTobacco companies have been exploiting women to buy their products since 1969. go >

No Estrogen After a HysterectomyEstrogen may increase a woman's risks for blood clots, stroke, dementia and cognitive problems. go >

It will come as welcome news to thousands of women that fat stored around the hips and posterior can actually be good for you, scientists say.
The traditional hourglass figure made famous by Marilyn Monroe and recently revived by the pop star Jennifer Lopez can also prevent heart disease, diabetes and high blood pressure.
But doctors warned women not to scrap the bikini diet just yet -- as excess fat around the stomach is still seen as a warning sign of health problems.
The study from the Institute of Preventative Medicine in Copenhagen is a classic case of apples-versus-pears.
According to the report, an "apple-shaped" woman with excess fat around the waist is likely to be less healthy than a curvaceous, "pear-shaped" woman.

This is because fat cells around the stomach pump out fatty acids to the blood much more readily than fat cells elsewhere, damaging the insulin system and raising the risk of diabetes and heart disease.
But a pear-shaped woman has fat stored around the hips, where it is more likely to produce adiponectin, a hormone which has anti-inflammatory effects and is associated with a reduced risk of heart disease.
The study looked at more than 50,000 men and women of different shapes over a period of time to observe individual health responses.
The Danish researchers concluded that the ideal measurement for a woman is at least a size 14 with hips measuring 40 inches or more.
Berit Heitmann, a professor of nutritional epidemiology who led the study, said too little muscle tissue or too little fat tissue, or both, around the hips can greatly increase risk of heart disease.
She said, "Fat on the hips is different from fat on the abdomen. If you do not have enough of this fat, you may risk heart attacks."
And Dr Heitmann said the study applied to both men and women. She added, "It is not a question of having wide hips, it is a question of having hips that are not too narrow.
"If there is too little fat or muscle around the hips, there is a correlating risk of heart attack and dying prematurely."
Dr Heitmann said women in particular appear to be protected from heart problems through having tissue around the hips.
Dr David Haslam, the chairman of the British National Obesity Forum, said that while pear-shaped people were at a greater risk of arthritis due to carrying greater weight, they were healthier overall thanks to the anti-inflammatory substance being produced.
He added, "For apple-shaped people, their fat is buried deep inside. It releases damaging chemicals that take the place of anti-inflammatory substances."
Dr Christine Edwards, a senior lecturer in human nutrition at Glasgow University, said weight was not the important factor in judging good health.
She said, "It is not just standing on the scales. You can have people of the same weight but because one person stores that weight around their hips and another around the stomach, it may mean one is healthier. Men tend to store weight on their stomachs. That is the worst you can be. You really want excess weight distributed evenly around the body."
Dr Edwards recommended measuring the waist or Body Mass Index (BMI), to gauge a healthy weight.
Men should have waists measuring less than 37 inches and for women, 32 inches, while both sexes should have a BMI of under 25.
Dr Edwards said women were designed to have some fat stored for childbirth and lactating, so a curvy figure was nothing to worry about. But she urged people to keep a check on excess weight around the midsection or a BMI of more than 30, which is classified as obese.
Susie Whalley, the deputy editor of Zest magazine, said the study reflected a more healthy attitude towards women's curves, highlighting recent soap advertisements using full-figured models.
She said, "Women are constantly comparing themselves to celebrities and get so much telling them to be wafer-thin, [that] it is really good to see a study saying there are health benefits to being curvy." Source: The Scotsman. Powered by Yellowbrix. Want more women's health news? Subscribe to the ThirdAge Women's Health Insider.